by Jennifer
My husband and I have been going back and forth about preschool next year for our son. He'll be two in October and I'm not so sure I want to send him to an organized program next fall. He's learning a lot at his family day care and he's so happy. He says all his ABCs, counts to 12, knows a bunch of colors and can name dozens of animals, speaks English and Spanish, speaks in short sentences more and more, and he learns the words to songs better than I do. So what does he need preschool for? Yet, I ponder it.
Let me start by saying that in NYC, the preschool craze is ridiculous. No. It's insane, ridiculous, crazy... all of it. People regularly spend $15,000 to $25,000 (plus required donations) to send their kids to prestigours preschools (even a particular YMCA school is in that category). I mean, hello...it ain't Harvard. And they're only 3-years old! I'm not playing on that field. No way. Frankly, I'd be happy to wait until he's nearly 4 and send him to universal pre-k. My husband essentially agrees. But it's hard not to think about it when people around you are obsessed. I feel like he's already learning so much, perhaps in a more passive way.
That's why this article, Should preschools teach all work and no play, really hit me...
from the article...
Rebecca Marcon, a developmental psychologist
and education researcher at the University of North Florida in
Jacksonville, agrees. In 1999, Marcon published a study in the journal
Developmental Psychology that looked at 721 4-year-olds selected from
three different preschool models: play based, academic (adult directed)
and middle of the road (programs that did not follow either
philosophy). Marcon followed the children’s language, self-help,
social, motor and adaptive development along with basic skills.
“What
we found in our research then and in ongoing studies is that children
who were in a [play-based] preschool program showed stronger academic
performance in all subject areas measured compared to children who had
been in more academically focused or more middle-of-the-road programs,”
says Marcon.
According to Marcon and other researchers,
children who are subjected to overly academic environments early on
have more behavior problems later and are less likely to be
enthusiastic, creative learners and thinkers.
“You
will frequently get short-term gains with a highly academic approach
(in preschool), but they come with long-term consequences,” says
Marcon. “A lot of early childhood studies only follow children to third
grade. But when you take it into fourth grade and beyond that’s where
you see the big difference. That’s when children have to be more
independent and think.”
and later in the article, the head of Stanford University's school of education says:
Play versus academics is a false dichotomy, she says. “The idea is that
at the preschool age, all learning should be fun. Adults should be
intentional about the teaching, but it should be embedded in everyday
life and fun activities.”
Frankly, that's kind of what I feel my son's life is like now. His daycare caregivers taught him his colors and numbers, repeated playing of the alphabet song and my goofy antics helped with the letters, etc. Learning is a part of his fun, it just happens in his day. He's plenty socialized at day care, too. And really, can't he wait until he's 4 to sit still and have his first significant exposure to the structured learning he'll be a part of for all of his young life?
What do you think about preschool and its purpose and place in a toddler's life? Do you think it's a must? Optional? Should it be academic? Playful? Is there preschool pressure where you live? And if so, how do you deflect it if you're the odd-mom-out?